Skip to content

WIP: [Storage] Windows tests should all use vTPM - module CDI Clone#4571

Open
acinko-rh wants to merge 5 commits intoRedHatQE:mainfrom
acinko-rh:add_vtpm_to_cdi_clone
Open

WIP: [Storage] Windows tests should all use vTPM - module CDI Clone#4571
acinko-rh wants to merge 5 commits intoRedHatQE:mainfrom
acinko-rh:add_vtpm_to_cdi_clone

Conversation

@acinko-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@acinko-rh acinko-rh commented Apr 24, 2026

Short description:

PR merged to tier-2/3 that makes Windows test VMs in sig-storage use vTPM
(preferably through instancetypes, which should be the right and easy way to achieve this)

More details:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for reviewer:

Co-Authored: Claude Code

jira-ticket:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added tier3 test coverage for provisioning Windows VMs (including Windows 11) from cloned DataVolumes with vTPM enabled.
    • New validations ensure cloned DataVolumes complete successfully and resulting VMs report correct guest-agent info.
    • Added utilities to verify vTPM presence and guest-side TPM state; richer checks run when privileged access is available.

Co-Authored: Claude Code
Signed-off-by: Adam Cinko <acinko@redhat.com>
@acinko-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/wip

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

⛔ Ignored keywords (1)
  • WIP

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4a192911-d7da-4c88-82a6-cd9f1ea41a62

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds Windows vTPM provisioning and validation: a helper that creates Windows VMs with vTPM from cloned DataVolumes, validates guest-agent OS info, and conditionally verifies vTPM with admin privileges. Adds a tier3 test cloning a Windows 11 DV and a utility to verify vTPM at hypervisor and guest levels.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Windows vTPM test logic
tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py
Adds create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info(...) to build Windows VirtualMachineForTests (fixed instance type, vm_preference from windows_version, data volume template from source DV), wait for readiness, validate guest-agent OS info, and conditionally run vTPM checks. Adds test_successful_vm_from_cloned_dv_windows_with_vtpm (tier3) that clones a Windows 11 DV from HTTP and invokes the helper.
vTPM verification utility
tests/storage/utils.py
Adds verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm(vm, admin_client) which asserts KubeVirt VM XML TPM settings (tpm-crb, persistent state) and executes a WMIC query on the Windows guest via SSH to assert TPM enabled status; includes logging and assertion failures for mismatches.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is incomplete. While it provides a short description of the change, critical sections like 'More details', 'What this PR does / why we need it', and 'Which issue(s) this PR fixes' are missing or empty. Complete the missing template sections: add implementation details explaining how vTPM is enabled (via instancetypes), clarify the specific impact and rationale, and reference any related Jira ticket or issues.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check ✅ Passed The title mentions vTPM and the CDI Clone module, which directly aligns with the changes—adding vTPM validation and a new test for Windows VMs with vTPM in the CDI Clone test suite.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@acinko-rh acinko-rh changed the title [Storage] Windows tests should all use vTPM [Storage] Windows tests should all use vTPM - module CDI Clone Apr 24, 2026
@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Report bugs in Issues

Welcome! 🎉

This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features:

🔄 Automatic Actions

  • Reviewer Assignment: Reviewers are automatically assigned based on the OWNERS file in the repository root
  • Size Labeling: PR size labels (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL) are automatically applied based on changes
  • Issue Creation: A tracking issue is created for this PR and will be closed when the PR is merged or closed
  • Branch Labeling: Branch-specific labels are applied to track the target branch
  • Auto-verification: Auto-verified users have their PRs automatically marked as verified
  • Labels: Enabled categories: branch, can-be-merged, cherry-pick, has-conflicts, hold, needs-rebase, size, verified, wip

📋 Available Commands

PR Status Management

  • /wip - Mark PR as work in progress (adds WIP: prefix to title)
  • /wip cancel - Remove work in progress status
  • /hold - Block PR merging (approvers only)
  • /hold cancel - Unblock PR merging
  • /verified - Mark PR as verified
  • /verified cancel - Remove verification status
  • /reprocess - Trigger complete PR workflow reprocessing (useful if webhook failed or configuration changed)
  • /regenerate-welcome - Regenerate this welcome message

Review & Approval

  • /lgtm - Approve changes (looks good to me)
  • /approve - Approve PR (approvers only)
  • /assign-reviewers - Assign reviewers based on OWNERS file
  • /assign-reviewer @username - Assign specific reviewer
  • /check-can-merge - Check if PR meets merge requirements

Testing & Validation

  • /retest tox - Run Python test suite with tox
  • /retest build-container - Rebuild and test container image
  • /retest verify-bugs-are-open - verify-bugs-are-open
  • /retest all - Run all available tests

Container Operations

  • /build-and-push-container - Build and push container image (tagged with PR number)
    • Supports additional build arguments: /build-and-push-container --build-arg KEY=value

Cherry-pick Operations

  • /cherry-pick <branch> - Schedule cherry-pick to target branch when PR is merged
    • Multiple branches: /cherry-pick branch1 branch2 branch3

Label Management

  • /<label-name> - Add a label to the PR
  • /<label-name> cancel - Remove a label from the PR

✅ Merge Requirements

This PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:

  1. Approval: /approve from at least one approver
  2. LGTM Count: Minimum 2 /lgtm from reviewers
  3. Status Checks: All required status checks must pass
  4. No Blockers: No wip, hold, has-conflicts labels and PR must be mergeable (no conflicts)
  5. Verified: PR must be marked as verified

📊 Review Process

Approvers and Reviewers

Approvers:

  • jpeimer

Reviewers:

  • Ahmad-Hafe
  • acinko-rh
  • dalia-frank
  • ema-aka-young
  • josemacassan
  • jpeimer
  • kgoldbla
  • kshvaika
Available Labels
  • hold
  • verified
  • wip
  • lgtm
  • approve
AI Features
  • Cherry-Pick Conflict Resolution: Enabled (claude/claude-opus-4-6[1m])

💡 Tips

  • WIP Status: Use /wip when your PR is not ready for review
  • Verification: The verified label is removed on new commits unless the push is detected as a clean rebase
  • Cherry-picking: Cherry-pick labels are processed when the PR is merged
  • Container Builds: Container images are automatically tagged with the PR number
  • Permission Levels: Some commands require approver permissions
  • Auto-verified Users: Certain users have automatic verification and merge privileges

For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
tests/storage/utils.py (1)

541-584: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

[HIGH] Landing a helper already labeled "DEBUG ONLY - MARKED FOR DELETION" contradicts the dead-code policy.

The docstring and the trailing # TODO: Remove - debug only on Line 541 announce this function is scaffolding, yet it's imported and exercised by test_successful_vm_from_cloned_dv_windows_with_vtpm in tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py. Either the verification is part of the intended coverage (then drop the "debug only" labeling and keep it properly) or it isn't (then don't merge it). Shipping code pre-flagged for deletion is how dead code quietly permanents itself in the repo.

As per coding guidelines: "No dead code in Python. Every function, variable, fixture MUST be used or removed."

✂️ Suggested cleanup
-def verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm(vm, admin_client):  # TODO: Remove - debug only
+def verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm(vm, admin_client):
     """
     Verify vTPM is properly configured and detected in a Windows VM.
 
-    **DEBUG ONLY - MARKED FOR DELETION**
-
     Performs two-layer validation:
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@tests/storage/utils.py` around lines 541 - 584, The helper
verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm is labelled "DEBUG ONLY - MARKED FOR DELETION" yet is
referenced by test_successful_vm_from_cloned_dv_windows_with_vtpm, so remove the
dead-code marker and make the function a first-class test utility: delete the "#
TODO: Remove - debug only" comment, update the docstring to reflect it is an
intentional test helper (remove "DEBUG ONLY"), and ensure any module
exports/imports remain correct so tests continue to import
verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm; alternatively, if you truly intend to delete it,
remove all imports/usages (notably in tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py) and
delete the function instead.
tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py (1)

1-3: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

[MEDIUM] New feature test requires an STP (or RFE/Jira epic) link in the module docstring.

The module docstring is still just """Clone tests""", but this PR adds a new feature test (test_successful_vm_from_cloned_dv_windows_with_vtpm) covering vTPM on cloned Windows DVs. As per coding guidelines: "Every new feature test module MUST include an STP link in the module docstring. If there is no STP, the module docstring MUST include a link to the RFE or Jira epic (not support cases) for coverage tracking." The PR description also has an empty Jira ticket field, which needs to be filled in.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py` around lines 1 - 3, The module
docstring currently just says "Clone tests" but this PR adds the new feature
test test_successful_vm_from_cloned_dv_windows_with_vtpm, so update the module
docstring to include the required STP link (or, if none, the RFE/Jira epic URL)
for coverage tracking and also populate the empty Jira ticket field in the PR
description; modify the top-of-file docstring in the test module to include a
one-line reference (e.g., "STP: <link>" or "RFE/Jira: <epic-link>") alongside
the existing summary so automated checks and reviewers can verify the
traceability.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py`:
- Line 248: The test contains a placeholder Polarion ID in the pytest marker:
replace pytest.mark.polarion("CNV-XXXXX") in
tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py with the real Polarion/Jira ID for this
test (use the official ticket string), and update the PR description’s empty
Jira ticket field to the same ID so reporting and traceability are correct;
ensure the marker value is a non-placeholder string and re-run the
test/reporting to verify the ID appears properly.
- Around line 72-110: Move the helper
create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info out of the test module
into tests/storage/utils.py (next to
create_windows_vm_validate_guest_agent_info), make admin_client a required
positional argument (remove the =None default) so vTPM validation always runs,
relocate the imports to the top of the new module (import
validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os from utilities.ssp, wait_for_windows_vm from
utilities.virt, and verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm from tests.storage.utils or the
correct canonical module), and remove the runtime None check (do not gate
verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm with if admin_client; call it directly). Ensure any
remaining None comparisons use identity (if x is None) when applicable.
- Line 103: The test creates the VM in a halted state
(VirtualMachine.RunStrategy.HALTED) so wait_for_windows_vm(vm=vm, ...) fails
because it immediately runs SSH; call running_vm(vm=vm) to transition the VM to
Running before calling wait_for_windows_vm. Insert a running_vm(vm=vm)
invocation inside the context manager just prior to wait_for_windows_vm
(mirroring create_windows19_vm) so the VM is started and SSH connectivity is
available.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py`:
- Around line 1-3: The module docstring currently just says "Clone tests" but
this PR adds the new feature test
test_successful_vm_from_cloned_dv_windows_with_vtpm, so update the module
docstring to include the required STP link (or, if none, the RFE/Jira epic URL)
for coverage tracking and also populate the empty Jira ticket field in the PR
description; modify the top-of-file docstring in the test module to include a
one-line reference (e.g., "STP: <link>" or "RFE/Jira: <epic-link>") alongside
the existing summary so automated checks and reviewers can verify the
traceability.

In `@tests/storage/utils.py`:
- Around line 541-584: The helper verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm is labelled "DEBUG
ONLY - MARKED FOR DELETION" yet is referenced by
test_successful_vm_from_cloned_dv_windows_with_vtpm, so remove the dead-code
marker and make the function a first-class test utility: delete the "# TODO:
Remove - debug only" comment, update the docstring to reflect it is an
intentional test helper (remove "DEBUG ONLY"), and ensure any module
exports/imports remain correct so tests continue to import
verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm; alternatively, if you truly intend to delete it,
remove all imports/usages (notably in tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py) and
delete the function instead.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 11e3ec8d-d6fa-4f0b-9a1f-4e1aa2980145

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0feeb8f and 06bece3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py
  • tests/storage/utils.py

Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
Comment on lines +72 to +110
def create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info(
dv,
namespace,
unprivileged_client,
windows_version,
admin_client=None,
):
"""
Create Windows VM with vTPM using instance types and preferences.

Args:
dv: DataVolume to use for the VM
namespace: Namespace object
unprivileged_client: Client to use
windows_version: Windows version string ("11", "2k22", etc.)
admin_client: Optional admin client for vTPM validation
"""
from tests.storage.utils import validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os, wait_for_windows_vm

# Map Windows version to preference name
preference_name = f"windows.{windows_version}" # e.g., "windows.11", "windows.2k22"

with VirtualMachineForTests(
name=f"vm-win-{windows_version}-vtpm",
namespace=namespace.name,
client=unprivileged_client,
os_flavor=OS_FLAVOR_WINDOWS,
vm_instance_type=VirtualMachineClusterInstancetype(name="u1.large", client=unprivileged_client),
vm_preference=VirtualMachineClusterPreference(name=preference_name, client=unprivileged_client),
data_volume_template={"metadata": dv.res["metadata"], "spec": dv.res["spec"]},
) as vm:
wait_for_windows_vm(vm=vm, version=windows_version, timeout=TIMEOUT_40MIN)
validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os(vm=vm)

# Validate vTPM if admin_client provided
if admin_client:
from tests.storage.utils import verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm

verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm(vm=vm, admin_client=admin_client)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

[HIGH] Helper function must not live in a test_*.py module — and its imports must not live inside its body.

Multiple guideline violations are stacking up here:

  1. Helper in test file — As per coding guidelines: "conftest.py is for fixtures only. Helper functions, utility functions, and classes must NOT be defined in conftest.py or test_*.py; place them in dedicated utility modules instead." Move create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info to tests/storage/utils.py (right next to the sibling create_windows_vm_validate_guest_agent_info).

  2. Imports inside function body (Lines 89, 108) — As per coding guidelines: "Imports must always be at the top of the Python module. Do not import inside functions." Also, validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os originates from utilities.ssp and wait_for_windows_vm from utilities.virt; importing them via tests.storage.utils as a re-export surface is misleading. Import from the canonical modules.

  3. Optional vTPM validation defeats the PR's goaladmin_client=None plus the if admin_client: gate makes the whole reason this helper exists (vTPM verification) conditional and invisible to the caller. The PR title is literally "Windows tests should all use vTPM". As per coding guidelines: "Function behavior MUST be controlled via explicit arguments, not hardcoded internally. No hidden side effects" and "Do not use defensive programming. Fail fast and don't hide bugs with fake defaults." Make admin_client a required positional argument.

  4. Identity comparison for None — even if you keep the optional form, use if admin_client is not None:. As per coding guidelines: "Use identity for None: if x is None:".

♻️ Proposed refactor (after moving to tests/storage/utils.py)
-def create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info(
-    dv,
-    namespace,
-    unprivileged_client,
-    windows_version,
-    admin_client=None,
-):
-    """
-    Create Windows VM with vTPM using instance types and preferences.
-
-    Args:
-        dv: DataVolume to use for the VM
-        namespace: Namespace object
-        unprivileged_client: Client to use
-        windows_version: Windows version string ("11", "2k22", etc.)
-        admin_client: Optional admin client for vTPM validation
-    """
-    from tests.storage.utils import validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os, wait_for_windows_vm
-
-    # Map Windows version to preference name
-    preference_name = f"windows.{windows_version}"  # e.g., "windows.11", "windows.2k22"
-
-    with VirtualMachineForTests(
-        name=f"vm-win-{windows_version}-vtpm",
-        namespace=namespace.name,
-        client=unprivileged_client,
-        os_flavor=OS_FLAVOR_WINDOWS,
-        vm_instance_type=VirtualMachineClusterInstancetype(name="u1.large", client=unprivileged_client),
-        vm_preference=VirtualMachineClusterPreference(name=preference_name, client=unprivileged_client),
-        data_volume_template={"metadata": dv.res["metadata"], "spec": dv.res["spec"]},
-    ) as vm:
-        wait_for_windows_vm(vm=vm, version=windows_version, timeout=TIMEOUT_40MIN)
-        validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os(vm=vm)
-
-        # Validate vTPM if admin_client provided
-        if admin_client:
-            from tests.storage.utils import verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm
-
-            verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm(vm=vm, admin_client=admin_client)
+# In tests/storage/utils.py, with top-level imports:
+# from utilities.ssp import validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os
+# from utilities.virt import VirtualMachineForTests, wait_for_windows_vm
+# from ocp_resources.virtual_machine_cluster_instancetype import VirtualMachineClusterInstancetype
+# from ocp_resources.virtual_machine_cluster_preference import VirtualMachineClusterPreference
+
+def create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info(
+    dv,
+    namespace,
+    unprivileged_client,
+    admin_client,
+    windows_version,
+):
+    """Create a Windows VM with vTPM via instancetype/preference and validate guest agent + vTPM.
+
+    Args:
+        dv: Cloned DataVolume whose metadata/spec seed the VM's dataVolumeTemplate.
+        namespace: Namespace where the VM is created.
+        unprivileged_client: Client used to create the VM.
+        admin_client: Admin client required for privileged VM XML access during vTPM verification.
+        windows_version: Windows version suffix (e.g. "11", "2k22") used to pick the preference.
+    """
+    with VirtualMachineForTests(
+        name=f"vm-win-{windows_version}-vtpm",
+        namespace=namespace.name,
+        client=unprivileged_client,
+        os_flavor=OS_FLAVOR_WINDOWS,
+        vm_instance_type=VirtualMachineClusterInstancetype(name="u1.large", client=unprivileged_client),
+        vm_preference=VirtualMachineClusterPreference(
+            name=f"windows.{windows_version}", client=unprivileged_client
+        ),
+        data_volume_template={"metadata": dv.res["metadata"], "spec": dv.res["spec"]},
+    ) as vm:
+        wait_for_windows_vm(vm=vm, version=windows_version, timeout=TIMEOUT_40MIN)
+        validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os(vm=vm)
+        verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm(vm=vm, admin_client=admin_client)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py` around lines 72 - 110, Move the helper
create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info out of the test module
into tests/storage/utils.py (next to
create_windows_vm_validate_guest_agent_info), make admin_client a required
positional argument (remove the =None default) so vTPM validation always runs,
relocate the imports to the top of the new module (import
validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os from utilities.ssp, wait_for_windows_vm from
utilities.virt, and verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm from tests.storage.utils or the
correct canonical module), and remove the runtime None check (do not gate
verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm with if admin_client; call it directly). Ensure any
remaining None comparisons use identity (if x is None) when applicable.

Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
vm_preference=VirtualMachineClusterPreference(name=preference_name, client=unprivileged_client),
data_volume_template={"metadata": dv.res["metadata"], "spec": dv.res["spec"]},
) as vm:
wait_for_windows_vm(vm=vm, version=windows_version, timeout=TIMEOUT_40MIN)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check whether wait_for_windows_vm starts the VM, and cross-check the sibling pattern.
ast-grep --pattern 'def wait_for_windows_vm($$$):
  $$$'
echo "---"
rg -nP --type=py -C2 '\brunning_vm\s*\(|\bvm\.start\s*\(' utilities/virt.py | head -n 80

Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests

Length of output: 1959


🏁 Script executed:

# Get the context around line 103 in test_clone.py
cat -n tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py | sed -n '95,115p'

Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests

Length of output: 1140


🏁 Script executed:

# Get the sibling pattern from tests/storage/utils.py around line 375
cat -n tests/storage/utils.py | sed -n '370,385p'

Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests

Length of output: 781


🏁 Script executed:

# Check the full wait_for_windows_vm function to confirm it doesn't start the VM
cat -n utilities/virt.py | sed -n '1693,1710p'

Repository: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests

Length of output: 739


Add running_vm(vm=vm) before wait_for_windows_vm(...).

VirtualMachineForTests creates the VM with run_strategy=VirtualMachine.RunStrategy.HALTED, so the context manager at line 102 creates a stopped VM. The wait_for_windows_vm() function does not start the VM—it immediately attempts to execute vm.ssh_exec.run_command() (utilities/virt.py:1703), which requires SSH connectivity and therefore a Running VM. Without the VM in Running state, the SSH command will fail.

The sibling helper create_windows19_vm (tests/storage/utils.py:375) explicitly calls running_vm(vm=vm) before yielding, following the same pattern. Add the same call here before line 103:

Suggested change
    ) as vm:
        running_vm(vm=vm)
        wait_for_windows_vm(vm=vm, version=windows_version, timeout=TIMEOUT_40MIN)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py` at line 103, The test creates the VM
in a halted state (VirtualMachine.RunStrategy.HALTED) so
wait_for_windows_vm(vm=vm, ...) fails because it immediately runs SSH; call
running_vm(vm=vm) to transition the VM to Running before calling
wait_for_windows_vm. Insert a running_vm(vm=vm) invocation inside the context
manager just prior to wait_for_windows_vm (mirroring create_windows19_vm) so the
VM is started and SSH connectivity is available.

Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
windows_version: Windows version string ("11", "2k22", etc.)
admin_client: Optional admin client for vTPM validation
"""
from tests.storage.utils import validate_os_info_vmi_vs_windows_os, wait_for_windows_vm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please move imports to the beginning of the file

Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
namespace=namespace.name,
client=unprivileged_client,
os_flavor=OS_FLAVOR_WINDOWS,
vm_instance_type=VirtualMachineClusterInstancetype(name="u1.large", client=unprivileged_client),
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use U1_LARGE constant

Comment thread tests/storage/utils.py
vm_console.expect(pattern=file_content, timeout=TIMEOUT_20SEC)


def verify_vtpm_in_windows_vm(vm, admin_client): # TODO: Remove - debug only
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please mark PR as work-in-progress
/wip

Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
Comment on lines +260 to +268
with create_dv(
client=unprivileged_client,
source="pvc",
dv_name="dv-target-win11-vtpm",
namespace=data_volume_multi_storage_scope_function.namespace,
size=data_volume_multi_storage_scope_function.size,
source_pvc=data_volume_multi_storage_scope_function.name,
storage_class=data_volume_multi_storage_scope_function.storage_class,
) as cdv:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So here, you created a DV, which is cloned from data_volume_multi_storage_scope_function

Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
Comment on lines +270 to +276
create_windows_vm_with_vtpm_validate_guest_agent_info(
dv=cdv,
namespace=namespace,
unprivileged_client=unprivileged_client,
windows_version="11",
admin_client=admin_client,
)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here, the way this function is written right now, your VM will create a new DV, which is a clone of cdv.

Comment thread tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py Outdated
{
"dv_name": "dv-source-win11-vtpm",
"source": "http",
"image": f"{Images.Windows.DIR}/{Images.Windows.WIN11_IMG}",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may be better to use this image - images in the 'registry' are better maintained. And WINDOWS_2022 is more preferable than Win11.
url=f"{get_test_artifact_server_url(schema='registry')}/{WINDOWS_2022[CONTAINER_DISK_IMAGE_PATH_STR]}", (see how it's used in another test)

Signed-off-by: Adam Cinko <acinko@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Cinko <acinko@redhat.com>
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 28, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.66%. Comparing base (b4ad2e0) to head (1dcdcb0).
⚠️ Report is 97 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4571      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.63%   98.66%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        2420     2477      +57     
==========================================
+ Hits         2387     2444      +57     
  Misses         33       33              
Flag Coverage Δ
utilities 98.66% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Signed-off-by: Adam Cinko <acinko@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants